Tag: Single Bank Platforms

Single Bank Platforms

P&L’s One to Watch in 2018

P&L Report Card

With the shackles being thrown off at so many institutions in terms of budget and resources, this is an interesting category. Historically this award has been about the late movers, however last year we changed tack a little to reflect where we think the big moves will come from, meaning even those institutions with all-singing-all-dancing platforms were contenders.

The development cycle’s length means it can be tricky to identify a mover in the succeeding 12 months and this can probably be used as an excuse for last year’s winner of this award, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, because the bank still seems to have some way to go. As noted, it is vital that the e-FX teams get budget if it is to continue to compete and build on what are some good, solid foundations.

Editor’s Choice

Report Card

Famously the most subjective of our awards, last year Colin shifted its focus so that, rather than being awarded to the bank perceived as most likely to challenge for supremacy in the single dealer space, it would go to the one that was most likely to win more awards than it did this year. I agree with the logic underpinning this change – namely that we’re at a point in time where it is unlikely that there will be, as Colin put it, a “serious move” in the single-dealer space – and thus will also embrace this approach.

At the outset I’ll note that this criteria clearly disadvantages the platforms that traditionally win the most awards each year, even though we clearly think that these are the most well-rounded platforms available.

2018 Profit & Loss Innovation Award

P&L Report Card

With the words “MiFID II” ringing in our years we have to say that, yet again, last year was not a great one for innovation. We are sure that some great ideas exist – it’s just that the budget wasn’t available to make them a reality.

Another factor in the slow down in innovation we have observed over the past few years is the maturity of the single dealer platform industry, when so many are full service, where do you go? Throw in the fear factor that still permeates the FX banking world and you still have people coming up with ideas, thankfully, but executing them is a difficult and arduous task – thanks mainly to “Dr No”, or the compliance teams as they are otherwise known.

Best Execution

P&L Report Card

Although several firms have been focused on this for years, it did seem like a year or two ago, a shroud was lifted from so many in the foreign exchange market and they were able to see what best execution really meant. Gone were the days of ringing your mate to get the deal done, or directing a trade to a provider as a “reward” for business elsewhere – suddenly FX execution was a big deal.

If we are being honest we still think there are too many clients out there who don’t take their FX execution seriously enough, but for those that do, the sell side has come up with solutions that offer plenty of choice.

Best FX Platform

P&L Report Card

It is fair to say that for the single dealer platform in FX the comeback is complete. Just a few years ago one could hardly move for predictions of the product’s demise, although it is noticeable that few, if any, major banks stopped investing. There was a hiatus of sorts at some institutions, but 2016 saw the realisation that investment is a continuous process and 2017 saw the first fruit of those investment seeds ripen.

It has to be said, there are still one or two banks continuing to debate the need for investment in a single dealer platform, however the discussion is probably part of a wider conversation about the institution’s willingness to commit to FX full stop. At the top end of the table, investment dollars are not bountiful by any means, but they are there, and are being used.

Best Platform

P&L Report Card

Although there is still definitely a push towards homogenising asset classes on the part of some regulators, generally speaking the last few years have seen practitioners realise that FX in particular, cannot fit into any of the boxes they currently have labelled “equities”.

Some banks went down this route and tried to lever FICC into the equities model and generally speaking it didn’t go well – as shown by those institutions retreating back to their siloed models.

This does not mean, however, that a strong multi-asset class offering cannot be built – it most certainly can, but it does mean there are inevitable challenges associated with doing so. First and probably foremost, which business runs the project? Even within FICC there are different drivers and requirements, throw in equities and the number multiplies by several magnitudes.

The 2018 Digital FX Awards Eye on the Client

If one phrase could describe a year in financial markets, 2017 would definitely be the year of MiFID II – the regulation dominated a lot of headlines, thinking and, importantly, budgets throughout the year.

In the single dealer platform space, this meant that if other work was done, it probably happened early in the year while people were still somewhat complacent about another delay to the regulation. Once we entered the second half of the year, the message from all banks was pretty much the same – technology budgets and resources were sucked up by MiFID II on a huge scale.

“Eye on the Client”: The 2017 Profit & Loss Digital FX Awards

In broader society, the year 2016 was a dichotomy – it was a horror year in terms of global celebrities passing away, especially musicians, but it was a great year if you are a fan of sports teams like Leicester City or the Chicago Cubs.

Likewise, it could be easy to claim that 2016 was a horror year for e-FX in terms of product development and budget for anything other than compliance and regulation; however, there were pockets of optimism in the industry. It should also be noted that in terms of product delivery, the slowdown is natural and should have been expected – after all, if you already offer most products and services it is difficult to add to them.