Tag: Market Making

Market Making

In the FICC of It

After a week-long absence Profit & Loss‘ managing editor, Colin Lambert, and editor, Galen Stops, are back on the airwaves to discuss some of the most eye-catching items in the news recently. They begin with some reader feedback from stories published last week. Firstly, a story about the attempt by a futures exchange to introduce […]

Trading Firms Cry “Last Look” in the Futures Market

As a futures exchange proposes a new speed bump mechanism, a number of market participants are coming out in opposition to it. Some of the arguments they’re making will sound familiar to those in the FX markets, says Galen Stops. On February 1 the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) put the cat amongst the proverbial pigeons by […]

And Another Thing…

I have been quite vocal in recent weeks about the need for responsibility in financial markets generally and in particular have expressed the opinion (which has not gone down that well I will confess) that unless there are specific circumstances, for example, a bilateral trade on a private venue where both parties agree it was wrong, we should never consider re-papering trades. It is now time to take a different perspective on this, although I hasten to add I have not changed my mind – “always certain”!

Flow Traders: Standing Out from the Crowd

Robbert Sijbrandij, head of FX at Flow Traders, talks to Galen Stops about why he thinks there’s still room for more non-bank liquidity providers in the FX market.Dutch proprietary trading firm, Flow Traders, has spent the past two years building out its FX business line. The firm trades in the region of €750- €800 billion of ETFs per year, of which roughly two-thirds has an FX angle, meaning that Flow Traders was already doing in the region of €2-3 billion of FX on a busy day before they decided to become a liquidity maker in FX.

Flow Traders: Standing Out from the Crowd

Robbert Sijbrandij, head of FX at Flow Traders, talks to Galen Stops about why he thinks there’s still room for more non-bank liquidity providers in the FX market.Dutch proprietary trading firm, Flow Traders, has spent the past two years building out its FX business line. The firm trades in the region of €750- €800 billion of ETFs per year, of which roughly two-thirds has an FX angle, meaning that Flow Traders was already doing in the region of €2-3 billion of FX on a busy day before they decided to become a liquidity maker in FX.

The Profit & Loss Crystal Ball

Once again, it’s that time of year when our editorial staff dust off the infamous Profit & Loss crystal ball in order to take a peek into the future and tell our readers what they should expect from the year ahead. Colin Lambert’s “Trade of the Year” makes a welcome return, and he’s back with a bang as he focuses on the drivers of the ever-popular NOK/MXN pair. As has become custom, Lambert is also predicting consolidation within the FX industry, but regular readers might just be surprised to find out that for once he doesn’t think that the M&A activity will be on the platform side this year.

In the FICC of It

In this week’s podcast Colin Lambert and Galen Stops discuss the article penned for Profit & Loss by former FX trader Rohan Ramchandani about his trial and subsequent acquittal for market manipulation. While they generally agree on most points there is, inevitably, areas of disagreement, but that is nothing compared to when they move on (thanks to a quiet news week) to how they ranked each other’s predictions for 2018. The results are available on the website, but why did Stops given Lambert a 6/10 for a bitcoin prediction that was actually correct? And why did Lambert return the compliment given Stops just a 4/10 for his own crypto prediction? All will be revealed in this week’s In the FICC of It podcast, along with exactly which one of them scored the most points with their predictions.

RBA Report Casts the Net Wide in Seeking Flash Crash Answers

A report in the Reserve Bank of Australia’s Statement on Monetary Policy looks at the flash event in FX markets on January 3 when the yen appreciated some 3% in a matter of seconds before falling back, but fails to discern a single factor behind the move.
Citing the fragmentation of the FX markets across an increasing number of different platforms, the RBA says “it is difficult to draw firm conclusions on the cause of the flash event”, adding that three factors are likely to have contributed to what it terms the “brief deterioration in market conditions”.

In the FICC of It

Scepticism abounds in this week’s In the FICC of It podcast as Colin Lambert and Galen Stops take a look at the latest bank to unveil a digital markets strategy – including all your favourite buzzwords. While Stops believes this is the latest move in what will be a growing trend, our podcasters also wonder whether it’s not really just a rebranding exercise?
They then move into more traditional areas and discuss JP Morgan’s survey on FX market conditions, and while they agree with a lot of the findings, there are one or two areas that raise an eyebrow, not least around internalisation and AI.
AI-generated trading and liquidity are also the forefront as they move on to share their thoughts around the flash crash in Jardine Matheson stock last week in Singapore, including asking the question, what does it mean for market maker programmes and certain order types?
The discussion then moves on to look at the latest FX turnover surveys from the world’s FX committees, with particular attention on three interesting/puzzling (delete as appropriate) elements of the UK report surrounding RMB, NDFs and voice brokers.
The podcast ends on with Lambert praising “the optimism of youth” after Stops highlights what he thinks could be a very important line at the end of the latest document detailing an FX-related fine in the US – in other words, the cynic in him won the day!

XTX: Last Look Defense is “Nonsense”

Jeremy Smart, head of distribution at XTX Markets, is critical of arguments that pre-hedging in the last look window enables FX market markets to keep quoting prices, even in difficult market conditions. 

“The reality is that’s a nonsense. The basis on which a price is being made should be clear between a liquidity provider and the consumer. Now it’s not enough for me as an LP to turn around and say sometimes I’m a principle and sometimes I’m agent.

“If you’re agent, charge a fee and be clear that you’re passing on the exact fill that you got in the market to the customer, but do that before the transaction, not selectively transaction by transaction. So there needs to be much more clarity around that,” he says.